<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: beta!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openliberty.org/blog/2008/02/25/beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openliberty.org/blog/2008/02/25/beta/</link>
	<description>This is the general weblog for openLiberty projects and news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Equals Drummond &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Relationship Cards (R-Cards)</title>
		<link>http://www.openliberty.org/blog/2008/02/25/beta/comment-page-1/#comment-6987</link>
		<dc:creator>Equals Drummond &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Relationship Cards (R-Cards)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openliberty.org/blog/2008/02/25/beta/#comment-6987</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course readers of this blog know what data sharing protocol I have in mind: XDI—specifically the XDI RDF model. It’s particularly well-suited to r-cards because XDI link contracts provide a portable, machine-readable description of the mutually-agreed data sharing controls. But it’s important to clarify that any data sharing protocol supported by both parties will work. As an example, Asa Hardcastle showed a wonderful demo of OpenID-enabled Liberty ID-WSF at Spring IIW, and we are deep in conversations about how UDI discovery for ID-WSF endpoints can work. OpenID Attribute Exchange is another option because any OpenID identifier can already support XRDS service discovery. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course readers of this blog know what data sharing protocol I have in mind: XDI—specifically the XDI RDF model. It’s particularly well-suited to r-cards because XDI link contracts provide a portable, machine-readable description of the mutually-agreed data sharing controls. But it’s important to clarify that any data sharing protocol supported by both parties will work. As an example, Asa Hardcastle showed a wonderful demo of OpenID-enabled Liberty ID-WSF at Spring IIW, and we are deep in conversations about how UDI discovery for ID-WSF endpoints can work. OpenID Attribute Exchange is another option because any OpenID identifier can already support XRDS service discovery. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julius Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.openliberty.org/blog/2008/02/25/beta/comment-page-1/#comment-4600</link>
		<dc:creator>Julius Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openliberty.org/blog/2008/02/25/beta/#comment-4600</guid>
		<description>not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.10 was released today.  Take a look!

http://juliusdavies.ca/commons-ssl/

Here are some details about the release:

http://lists.juliusdavies.ca/pipermail/not-yet-commons-ssl-juliusdavies.ca/2008-March/000102.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.10 was released today.  Take a look!</p>
<p><a href="http://juliusdavies.ca/commons-ssl/" rel="nofollow">http://juliusdavies.ca/commons-ssl/</a></p>
<p>Here are some details about the release:</p>
<p><a href="http://lists.juliusdavies.ca/pipermail/not-yet-commons-ssl-juliusdavies.ca/2008-March/000102.html" rel="nofollow">http://lists.juliusdavies.ca/pipermail/not-yet-commons-ssl-juliusdavies.ca/2008-March/000102.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beta from openLiberty.org &#171; SAML 2.0 Liberty Alliance News Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.openliberty.org/blog/2008/02/25/beta/comment-page-1/#comment-4484</link>
		<dc:creator>beta from openLiberty.org &#171; SAML 2.0 Liberty Alliance News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openliberty.org/blog/2008/02/25/beta/#comment-4484</guid>
		<description>[...] February 26, 2008   Some exciting news for those following the open source developments of openLiberty.org. Check out Asa&#8217;s post here and watch for more developments in 2Q [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 26, 2008   Some exciting news for those following the open source developments of openLiberty.org. Check out Asa&#8217;s post here and watch for more developments in 2Q [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

